Following are the considerations for foundation based on soil types:
Soil Type
|
Foundation
|
Trouble areas
| |
Types
|
Reason for use
| ||
Sand
|
Footings
|
Easy to construct and economical
| Bearing capacity may be a problem but in most cases it is sufficientExcessive settlement in wet and loose deposits. Confining pressure is usually low. |
Retaining Structures
|
Must be used since sand cannot support themselves
| ||
Deep foundations (Piles)
|
Uses friction resistance but low in bearing capacity
| ||
Clay
|
Footings
|
Economic but may have problem with bearing capacity in saturated clays
| Low bearing capacity.Generally low shear strength when wet. High consolidation in soft clays Swelling is possible. Over-consolidated clays may contain cracks and fissures. |
Retaining Structures
|
Clays are self-supportive up to a certain height (critical). Must be used if height increases beyond the critical.
| ||
Deep foundations (Piles)
|
If bearing capacity is low, piles may be driven to rock. May change formation of clay.
|
Soil Type
|
Nature of problem
|
Possible solution
|
Sand
|
Settlement
|
Loose sands must be compacted
|
Lowering water table may result in sand densification
| ||
Bearing Capacity
|
Compaction increases cohesion and friction thus bearing capacity increases
| |
Use of deep foundation
| ||
Clay
|
Consolidation
|
Lowering water table
|
Pre-loading
| ||
Drive pile to rock
| ||
Bearing capacity
|
Compaction
| |
Use of deep foundations
| ||
Expansion or swelling
|
Treat or stabilize soil
| |
Maintain constant water table
| ||
Alter soil nature (similar to stabilization)
| ||
Include swell pressure in design
|
No comments:
Post a Comment